![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
15q logical thinking test
http://www.think-logically.co.uk/lt.htm
I am pleased that I scored 100% on my first try, though I suspect most (if not all) of you will do the same.
I am pleased that I scored 100% on my first try, though I suspect most (if not all) of you will do the same.
no subject
That was amusing... now to get picky.
"Paris is in New Zealand." is not the same thing as
"Paris is wholely contained within New Zealand"
So if we answer this as a question posed on set membership (as implied by 'in') we have a problem. (Thus assuming Paris is a set not a element which is also part of the problem here)
As a logic statement:
There exists no x in Paris that is not also in New Zealand.
or
All members of Paris are members of New Zealand
rather than:
There exists an x in Paris in that is also in New Zealand.
Re: That was amusing... now to get picky.
Rome is in Italy.
Rome is in Ohio.
Which we can represent as a graph in a logically constant manner.
Rome
|--> Italy
'--> Ohio
(Ok, I _thought_ I was done being picky... I wasn't)
:)
Re: That was amusing... now to get picky.
So I guess someone didn't get 100%?
;)
Re: That was amusing... now to get picky.
no subject